Report Faults LEED Standards for 'Insufficient' Protection of Human Health

Latest News > Green Building News

LEED green building standards do a good job to encourage energy-efficient buildings, but they don't do enough to protect human health from, "the chemicals released from building materials, cleaning supplies, fuel combustion, pesticides and other hazardous substances."

So says a new, largely critical report from Environment and Human Health, Inc., (EHHI) a non-profit organization made up of doctors, public health professionals and policy experts who specialize in research examining environmental threats to human health.

In fact, the tighter buildings created by energy conservation efforts concentrate these hazardous substances, increasing the risks to human health, the study finds.

Tighter buildings often reduce the exchange of indoor and outdoor air. "Since outdoor air is often cleaner than indoor air, the reduction of the outdoor-indoor exchange tends to concentrate particles, gases and other chemicals that can lead to more intense human exposures than would be experienced in better-ventilated environments," according to the study summary.

The report faults the U.S. Green Building Council's (USGBC) LEED program in a number of areas: that energy-efficiency is given priority over human health; that no level of LEED certification—silver, gold or platinum—assures health protection; that LEED neglects drinking water quality and workers' occupational risks, and that the it provides a false impress that LEED-certified buildings protect human health.

EHHI recommends a number of changes to the LEED program:
Read the EHHI news release.

Download the report summary.

Download the full report.